<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ and Others on the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bookoven.com/2009/05/05/wsj-and-others-on-the-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bookoven.com/2009/05/05/wsj-and-others-on-the-iphone/</link>
	<description>we make books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:01:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookoven.com/2009/05/05/wsj-and-others-on-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookoven.com/?p=1970#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>The other *big* plus is silence - no disturbing the spouse when reading late at night or early in the morning. 
And you can turn the lights off - nightlight built in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other *big* plus is silence &#8211; no disturbing the spouse when reading late at night or early in the morning.<br />
And you can turn the lights off &#8211; nightlight built in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookoven.com/2009/05/05/wsj-and-others-on-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-11653</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookoven.com/?p=1970#comment-11653</guid>
		<description>Yeah every time I visit the NYTimes web page, I think: why don&#039;t you build a site that looks like your iphone app? So much better to read in a digital environment than your chaotic poor-cousin recreation of your broadsheet layout delivered to my laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah every time I visit the NYTimes web page, I think: why don&#8217;t you build a site that looks like your iphone app? So much better to read in a digital environment than your chaotic poor-cousin recreation of your broadsheet layout delivered to my laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blog.bookoven.com/2009/05/05/wsj-and-others-on-the-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-11648</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bookoven.com/?p=1970#comment-11648</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agree. Firstly, that for me, my iPod is the perfect reading machine. I run the battery flat every day, and 80% of the time, I am reading on it - be that web, email, RSS, Stanza etc.
But the NYTimes and WSJ apps are fantastic (when they work). Being based in the UK, I really enjoy being able to get an alternative voice (other than Guardian/BBC) on events. And having the app means that it is easy to read - a list of articles rather then scanning a big page for interesting headlines -  and *always* present - its like a super-bookmark.
I see this as an opportunity for US newspapers to really push their global brands. The Guardian/BBC are used to reaching out to a national audience - most UK papers are for the whole country. The US papers are city based - they now have a chance to go one better and become really international.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agree. Firstly, that for me, my iPod is the perfect reading machine. I run the battery flat every day, and 80% of the time, I am reading on it &#8211; be that web, email, RSS, Stanza etc.<br />
But the NYTimes and WSJ apps are fantastic (when they work). Being based in the UK, I really enjoy being able to get an alternative voice (other than Guardian/BBC) on events. And having the app means that it is easy to read &#8211; a list of articles rather then scanning a big page for interesting headlines &#8211;  and *always* present &#8211; its like a super-bookmark.<br />
I see this as an opportunity for US newspapers to really push their global brands. The Guardian/BBC are used to reaching out to a national audience &#8211; most UK papers are for the whole country. The US papers are city based &#8211; they now have a chance to go one better and become really international.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
